There are advantages and disadvantages of joint venture partnerships. However, we will highlight the benefits and challenges using three focal points, which include multinational organizations, joint businesses, and the host nation. To the multinational firm, a joint venture incorporates nearby wellsprings of capital, access to neighborhood financing, comprehension of the environment, viable administration, and a positive image. However, hindrances are that joint wander accomplice may wind up on the outside of local political changes, and the multinational organization may then be reprimanded for having upheld a past government (as a result of its association with nearby accomplices connected with that administration) and may even be faulted (properly or wrongly).
The favorable position for the joint investment accomplice is access to remote capital, outside innovation, and business sectors. The hindrance is that the remote multinational accomplice might be reprimanded for moves made by its home government since legislators do not consider organizations free of the arrangements of their home governments. When the foreign company accomplice is faulted, the joint business accomplice may be faulted, or the firm might be harmed by blacklists or fierce shows due to its remote character. The preferred standpoint of the host nation is access to remote capital, foreign innovation, and business market, all of which create work and remote trade. In addition, neighborhood specialists get the presentation and aptitude in propelling types of innovation. The weakness is losing control and forceful takeovers over issues of firms operating in the host nation.