Paper Name | The structure and performance consequences of equity grants to employees of new economy firms |
Author(s) | Ittner, C.D., R.A. Lambert and D.F. Larcker |
Source | Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 34, pp 89-127 (2003) |
Research Question / Objectives | - To identify whether the employee stock option has a positive impact or a negative impact on the value created.
- To ascertain whether these stock options motivate people to stay back with the company.
|
Motivation / Contribution | - Motivation: With the fall in the new technology companies after year 2000, the stock options were felt to have lost out and were thought to be ineffective to provide compensation. Since there was a difference of opinion on the issue, it was needed to do this research.
- Contribution: The research identifies the problem and also survey results attempt at solving the issues left open in the objectives.
|
Theory Development | - There was a long felt opinion that the stock options could turn out to be volatile when the share prices fall. The employees who are taking the stock should be prepared for a slow down. A bear as much as for a bull. This concept has been developed further and the approach of the executives in taking such compensation has been analyzed.
- The effect of such dilution of shares with institutional investors is also studied and developed in the paper.
|
Research Design | - A survey has been conducted which would help in arriving at appropriate conclusion for the issues raised in the objectives of this paper.
- The survey was conducted when there was a bull run and the reaction of the people whose shares are not up and moving, are also taken into consideration by employing suitable repricing. Effect of such re-pricing is also monitored. Instead of taking into account the short term gains and benefits, the analysis takes into account the long term price movement.
|
Results | - This paper presents two major results. One, it concludes, that providing stock options to the key value creators like the employees and executives of the company does not negatively affect the performance of the company nor the stock value. The dilution that is caused is only a myth and the value creation is beneficial to all parties concerned.
- Second, the performance of the equity grants is more related to the total value of a firm’s grants rather than on the type of employees or groups of employees who received them. But between the tech employees and non tech employees there existed a difference in grant value increase.
|
Implications for my research | - Compensation to the executives in terms of stock option, as per this research is supported. And it also concludes that the impact of such options on the value created is directly related to the amount of options granted rather than on to whom it is granted.
|
Paper Name | CEO incentives – it’s not how much you pay, but how |
Author(s) | Jenson MC and Murphy KJ |
Source | Harvard Business Review, Vol: 68, pp 138 – 153. (1990) |
Research Question / Objectives | - To identify whether the CEOs are receiving salaries that are related to the size of the company.
- To identify whether the CEO compensation, includes salary and bonus, is rising with the company’s rise in its earnings.
- To identify the change in the CEO compensation compared to that of 1984 and beyond.
|
Motivation / Contribution | - Motivation: There is a general expression of awe when the annual CEO salaries are noted by the magazines and newspapers. The researchers wanted to identify whether this is real or fictional.
- Contribution: The research identifies that the compensation received by the CEOs has not risen as it should have. As a matter of fact, they ascertained, their share in the company stock has fallen down.
|
Theory Development | - The researchers have employed appropriate collection of data and regression analysis to bring out the relationship between parameters marked out.
- Parameters identified for relationship monitoring include Change in salary and bonus and the impact of the same on current cash compensation and impact of change in the share holder value and the impact of the same on the CEO compensation.
|
Research Design | - A survey has been conducted spanning 5 decades and 2,505 CEOs in 1,400 publicly held companies. The results were subjected to regression analysis to identify and bring out the relationships between various metrics that have been taken.
|
Results | - The following results have been drawn out by the research. One, top executives are not receiving records salaries and benefits. Two, executive compensation does not reflect change in corporate performance. Three, compensation to CEOs is not very different from what it is for salaried and hourly wages people in the companies. Four, with respect to pay for performance, the CEO salary has only become worse.
|
Implications for my research | - Compensation to the CEOs is taken into account for the last five decades. This provides the information that there is no huge difference between the way executives are paid and the other employees of the company are paid.
- The impact of such a system is causing more concern for lack of salary and bonus rather than for paying the executives highly.
|